The need for user participation and representation to legitimize Internet governance - and consequently, ICANN itself - is the proper basis of all debates with regard to the At-Large Membership. While ICANN's founding documents and other communications indicate an institutional commitment by ICANN to "At-Large" or other public representation on the Board, we begin our defense of public representation's abiding importance with a value-based analysis of ICANN's need for a strong public voice, rooted in the impact that ICANN's activities have on the Internet community.
| Introduction | 1.1. A Value-based and Conceptual Approach |
© 2001 NAISProject.org
Privacy Policy
webmaster@naisproject.org