In a certain sense, the ICANN of 2001 and the ICANN of 1998 are not as far apart as they might seem. For both organizations, persistent questions demand quick resolution-and for both, community sentiment is deeply fragmented in its ideas about ICANN's future direction. Yet where the ICANN of 1998 had little idea of what the At-Large Membership might mean, or the role it might play, the ICANN of 2001 at least has the benefit of hindsight in seeking to resolve those issues.
| 1.2.7 The Bylaws Amendments in Yokohama | 1.3 Public Participation and the At-Large Membership |
© 2001 NAISProject.org
Privacy Policy
webmaster@naisproject.org